You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Design‐based methods to influence the completeness of response to self‐administered questionnaires
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.mr000048 |
| Authors |
Patricia Healy, Philip James Edwards, Valerie Smith, Edel Murphy, John Newell, Eimear Burke, Pauline Meskell, Sandra Galvin, Peter Lynn, Elizabeth Stovold, Bernard McCarthy, Linda M Biesty, Declan Devane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,974,586
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,210
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,929
of 341,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.