↓ Skip to main content

Tactile stimulation lowers stress in fish

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
43 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tactile stimulation lowers stress in fish
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2011
DOI 10.1038/ncomms1547
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta C. Soares, Rui F. Oliveira, Albert F.H. Ros, Alexandra S. Grutter, Redouan Bshary

Abstract

In humans, physical stimulation, such as massage therapy, reduces stress and has demonstrable health benefits. Grooming in primates may have similar effects but it remains unclear whether the positive effects are due to physical contact or to its social value. Here we show that physical stimulation reduces stress in a coral reef fish, the surgeonfish Ctenochaetus striatus. These fish regularly visit cleaner wrasses Labroides dimidiatus to have ectoparasites removed. The cleanerfish influences client decisions by physically touching the surgeonfish with its pectoral and pelvic fins, a behaviour known as tactile stimulation. We simulated this behaviour by exposing surgeonfish to mechanically moving cleanerfish models. Surgeonfish had significantly lower levels of cortisol when stimulated by moving models compared with controls with access to stationary models. Our results show that physical contact alone, without a social aspect, is enough to produce fitness-enhancing benefits, a situation so far only demonstrated in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 4 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 166 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 19%
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 55%
Environmental Science 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 27 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#379,612
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,005
of 58,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,335
of 153,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#2
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.