You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
geoknife: reproducible web‐processing of large gridded datasets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecography, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ecog.01880 |
| Authors |
Jordan S. Read, Jordan I. Walker, Alison P. Appling, David L. Blodgett, Emily K. Read, Luke A. Winslow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 31% |
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 56% |
| Scientists | 13 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,502,282
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#425
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,756
of 298,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.