↓ Skip to main content

Increased mesocorticolimbic dopamine during acute and repeated social defeat stress: modulation by corticotropin releasing factor receptors in the ventral tegmental area

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Increased mesocorticolimbic dopamine during acute and repeated social defeat stress: modulation by corticotropin releasing factor receptors in the ventral tegmental area
Published in
Psychopharmacology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00213-015-4082-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth N. Holly, Joseph F. DeBold, Klaus A. Miczek

Abstract

Stress activates a subset of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), increasing extracellular dopamine in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and nucleus accumbens shell (NAcSh). The stress neuropeptide corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) and its receptors (CRF-R1 and CRF-R2) are located within the VTA and directly and indirectly influence dopaminergic activity. However, it has yet to be shown in vivo whether VTA CRF receptor activation is necessary for acute and repeated stress-induced dopamine efflux. With intra-VTA CRF-R1 and CRF-R2 antagonism during social defeat, we assessed whether blockade of these receptors could prevent stress-induced dopamine increases in the mPFC and NAcSh using in vivo microdialysis. Rats were microinjected with a CRF-R1 or CRF-R2 antagonist into the VTA prior to social defeat stress on days 1, 4, 7, and 10. In vivo microdialysis for dopamine in the mPFC and NAcSh was performed during stress on days 1 and 10. During the first social defeat, extracellular dopamine was significantly elevated in both the mPFC and NAcSh, and this increase in the NAcSh was blocked by intra-VTA CRF-R2, but not CRF-R1, antagonism. During the final social defeat, the dopaminergic increase was neither sensitized nor habituated in the mPFC and NAcSh, and intra-VTA CRF-R2, but not CRF-R1, antagonism prevented the dopamine increase in both brain regions. These findings show that CRF-R2 in the VTA is necessary for acute and repeated stress-induced dopamine efflux in the NAcSh, but is only recruited into mPFC-projecting dopamine neurons with repeated stress exposure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 25 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Psychology 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2015.
All research outputs
#22,290,592
of 24,877,044 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#5,168
of 5,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,089
of 280,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#42
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,877,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.