↓ Skip to main content

Heritability of Brain Network Topology in 853 Twins and Siblings

Overview of attention for article published in 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heritability of Brain Network Topology in 853 Twins and Siblings
Published in
2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, April 2015
DOI 10.1109/isbi.2015.7163908
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Zhan, N. Jahanshad, J. Faskowitz, D. Zhu, G. Prasad, N. G. Martin, G.I. de Zubicaray, K.L. McMahon, M.J. Wright, P.M. Thompson

Abstract

Anatomical brain networks change throughout life and with diseases. Genetic analysis of these networks may help identify processes giving rise to heritable brain disorders, but we do not yet know which network measures are promising for genetic analyses. Many factors affect the downstream results, such as the tractography algorithm used to define structural connectivity. We tested nine different tractography algorithms and four normalization methods to compute brain networks for 853 young healthy adults (twins and their siblings). We fitted genetic structural equation models to all nine network measures, after a normalization step to increase network consistency across tractography algorithms. Probabilistic tractography algorithms with global optimization (such as Probtrackx and Hough) yielded higher heritability statistics than "greedy" algorithms (such as FACT) which process small neighborhoods at each step. Some global network measures (probtrackx-derived GLOB and ST) showed significant genetic effects, making them attractive targets for genome-wide association studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 17%
Computer Science 2 17%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%