| Title |
Quantitative relationship between coronary artery calcium score and hyperemic myocardial blood flow as assessed by hybrid 15O-water PET/CT imaging in patients evaluated for coronary artery disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12350-011-9476-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ibrahim Danad, Pieter G. Raijmakers, Yolande E. Appelman, Hendrik J. Harms, Stefan de Haan, Koen M. Marques, Cornelis van Kuijk, Cornelis P. Allaart, Otto S. Hoekstra, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Mark Lubberink, Albert C. van Rossum, Paul Knaapen |
| Abstract |
The incremental value of CAC over traditional risk factors to predict coronary vasodilator dysfunction and inherent myocardial blood flow (MBF) impairment is only scarcely documented (MBF). The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the relationship between CAC content, hyperemic MBF, and coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients undergoing hybrid (15)O-water PET/CT imaging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tunisia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 50% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,998,913
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1,105
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,393
of 154,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.