↓ Skip to main content

An improved theoretical model of canopy gap probability for Leaf Area Index estimation in woody ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Ecology & Management, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An improved theoretical model of canopy gap probability for Leaf Area Index estimation in woody ecosystems
Published in
Forest Ecology & Management, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.030
Authors

William Woodgate, Mathias Disney, John D. Armston, Simon D. Jones, Lola Suarez, Michael J. Hill, Phil Wilkes, Mariela Soto-Berelov, Andrew Haywood, Andrew Mellor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 13%
Engineering 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,975,082
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecology & Management
#1,997
of 5,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,445
of 395,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecology & Management
#25
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.