| Title |
Characterizing best–worst voting systems in the scoring context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Choice and Welfare, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00355-009-0417-1 |
| Authors |
José Luis García-Lapresta, A. A. J. Marley, Miguel Martínez-Panero |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 1 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#154
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,624
of 93,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them