↓ Skip to main content

Failing to learn: towards a unified design approach for failure-based learning

Overview of attention for article published in Educational technology research and development, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Failing to learn: towards a unified design approach for failure-based learning
Published in
Educational technology research and development, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11423-015-9399-0
Authors

Andrew A. Tawfik, Hui Rong, Ikseon Choi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 127 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 44 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 6%
Arts and Humanities 8 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,406,676
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#292
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,582
of 277,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.