↓ Skip to main content

Hip Abductor Muscle Weakness in Individuals with Gluteal Tendinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
48 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hip Abductor Muscle Weakness in Individuals with Gluteal Tendinopathy
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, March 2016
DOI 10.1249/mss.0000000000000781
Pubmed ID
Authors

KIM ALLISON, BILL VICENZINO, TIM V. WRIGLEY, ALISON GRIMALDI, PAUL W. HODGES, KIM L. BENNELL

Abstract

To compare hip abductor muscle strength between individuals with symptomatic, unilateral gluteal tendinopathy (GT) and asymptomatic controls. Fifty individuals with GT aged between 35 and 70 years, and 50 sex- and age-comparable controls were recruited from the community. Maximal isometric strength (torque normalized to body mass) of the hip abductors was recorded in supine using an instrumented manual muscle tester. A two-way mixed analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with covariates of self-reported pain during testing and pain limiting maximum effort, was used to compare hip abductor strength of the symptomatic and asymptomatic hip between GT and control individuals. Data were expressed as mean and standard deviation, with the pairwise comparisons expressed as mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Individuals with GT demonstrated significantly lower hip abductor torque of both their symptomatic and asymptomatic hip than healthy controls (both p<0.05) with mean strength deficits of 0.35 Nm/kg (32%) on the symptomatic hip and 0.25 Nm/kg (23%) on the asymptomatic hip. In individuals with GT, the symptomatic hip was significantly weaker than the asymptomatic hip with a mean strength deficit of 0.09 Nm/kg (11%) (p<0.05). People with unilateral GT demonstrate significant weakness of the hip abductor muscles bilaterally when compared with healthy controls. Although it is not clear whether hip weakness precedes GT or is a consequence of the condition, the findings provide a basis to consider hip abductor muscle weakness in the treatment plan for management of GT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 123 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 24%
Other 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 27%
Sports and Recreations 13 10%
Engineering 4 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#822,807
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#743
of 7,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,114
of 313,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#11
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.