↓ Skip to main content

Improving surface and defect center chemistry of fluorescent nanodiamonds for imaging purposes—a review

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
28 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Improving surface and defect center chemistry of fluorescent nanodiamonds for imaging purposes—a review
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00216-015-8849-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Nagl, Simon Robert Hemelaar, Romana Schirhagl

Abstract

Diamonds are widely used for jewelry owing to their superior optical properties accounting for their fascinating beauty. Beyond the sparkle, diamond is highly investigated in materials science for its remarkable properties. Recently, fluorescent defects in diamond, particularly the negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy (NV(-)) center, have gained much attention: The NV(-) center emits stable, nonbleaching fluorescence, and thus could be utilized in biolabeling, as a light source, or as a Förster resonance energy transfer donor. Even more remarkable are its spin properties: with the fluorescence intensity of the NV(-) center reacting to the presence of small magnetic fields, it can be utilized as a sensor for magnetic fields as small as the field of a single electron spin. However, a reproducible defect and surface and defect chemistry are crucial to all applications. In this article we review methods for using nanodiamonds for different imaging purposes. The article covers (1) dispersion of particles, (2) surface cleaning, (3) particle size selection and reduction, (4) defect properties, and (5) functionalization and attachment to nanostructures, e.g., scanning probe microscopy tips. Graphical Abstract We review how diamond surface and defect chemistry can be optimized for different (bio) applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 34%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 47 31%
Chemistry 28 18%
Materials Science 15 10%
Engineering 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,343,963
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,992
of 9,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,478
of 275,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#22
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.