↓ Skip to main content

Fast analysis of glibenclamide and its impurities: quality by design framework in capillary electrophoresis method development

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Fast analysis of glibenclamide and its impurities: quality by design framework in capillary electrophoresis method development
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00216-015-8921-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Furlanetto, Serena Orlandini, Benedetta Pasquini, Claudia Caprini, Paola Mura, Sergio Pinzauti

Abstract

A fast capillary zone electrophoresis method for the simultaneous analysis of glibenclamide and its impurities (IA and IB) in pharmaceutical dosage forms was fully developed within a quality by design framework. Critical quality attributes were represented by IA peak efficiency, critical resolution between glibenclamide and IB, and analysis time. Experimental design was efficiently used for rapid and systematic method optimization. A 3(5)//16 symmetric screening matrix was chosen for investigation of the five selected critical process parameters throughout the knowledge space, and the results obtained were the basis for the planning of the subsequent response surface study. A Box-Behnken design for three factors allowed the contour plots to be drawn and the design space to be identified by introduction of the concept of probability. The design space corresponded to the multidimensional region where all the critical quality attributes reached the desired values with a degree of probability π ≥ 90%. Under the selected working conditions, the full separation of the analytes was obtained in less than 2 min. A full factorial design simultaneously allowed the design space to be validated and method robustness to be tested. A control strategy was finally implemented by means of a system suitability test. The method was fully validated and was applied to real samples of glibenclamide tablets. Graphical Abstract Identification of sequence variants in IgG Fc mixtures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 35%
Arts and Humanities 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,541
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,073
of 277,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#71
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.