| Title |
Maternal and Peer Regulation of Adolescent Emotion: Associations with Depressive Symptoms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10802-015-0084-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica P. Lougheed, Wendy M. Craig, Debra Pepler, Jennifer Connolly, Arland O’Hara, Isabela Granic, Tom Hollenstein |
| Abstract |
Emotion socialization by close relationship partners plays a role in adolescent depression. In the current study, a microsocial approach was used to examine how adolescents' emotions are socialized by their mothers and close friends in real time, and how these interpersonal emotion dynamics are related to adolescent depressive symptoms. Participants were 83 adolescents aged 16 to 17 years who participated in conflict discussions with their mothers and self-nominated close friends. Adolescents' positive and negative emotions, and mothers' and peers' supportive regulation of adolescent emotions, were coded in real time. Two multilevel survival analyses in a 2-level Cox hazard regression framework predicted the hazard rate of (1) mothers' supportive regulation of adolescents' emotions, and (2) peers' supportive regulation of adolescents' emotions. The likelihood of maternal supportiveness, regardless of adolescent emotions, was lower for adolescents with higher depressive symptoms. In addition, peers were less likely to up-regulate adolescent positive emotions at higher levels of adolescent depressive symptoms. The results of the current study support interpersonal models of depression and demonstrate the importance of real-time interpersonal emotion processes in adolescent depressive symptoms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 62 | 54% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2021.
All research outputs
#14,276,973
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,094
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,873
of 286,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.