↓ Skip to main content

ZNRF3 contributes to the growth of lung carcinoma via inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin pathway and is regulated by miR-93

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
ZNRF3 contributes to the growth of lung carcinoma via inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin pathway and is regulated by miR-93
Published in
Tumor Biology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3949-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jichan Shi, Xiangao Jiang, Zhijie Yu, Guiqing He, Hongye Ning, Zhengxing Wu, Yuwei Cai, Hehe Yu, Aiqiong Chen

Abstract

Lung carcinoma is the most common cancer with increasing morbidity, inefficient therapeutic modality, and poor prognosis, due to the lack of understanding of its related molecular mechanism. ZNRF3 is a newly identified negative regulator of Wnt signaling. In this study, we found that ZNRF3 level is reduced in lung carcinoma compared with normal lung tissue and its expression level is positively correlated with the survival of lung cancer patients. Restoration of ZNRF3 suppressed the proliferation and cell cycle progression of lung cancer cell lines. Suppression of ZNRF3 expression in normal lung cells increased the proliferation rates. In an animal model, ZNRF3 was shown to suppress the growth of lung cancer xenografts. ZNRF3 was shown to negatively regulate the activation of Wnt signaling in lung cancerous and normal cells. Further studies revealed that ZNRF3 is a target of miR-93, an oncogenic microRNA (miRNA) for lung cancer progression. Collectively, we found that miR-93/ZNRF3/Wnt/β-catenin regulatory network contributes to the growth of lung carcinoma. Targeting this pathway may be a promising strategy for lung cancer therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,293,238
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,064
of 274,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#173
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.