↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and Persistence with Liraglutide Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Routine Clinical Practice—EVIDENCE: A Prospective, 2-Year Follow-Up, Observational, Post-Marketing Study

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness and Persistence with Liraglutide Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Routine Clinical Practice—EVIDENCE: A Prospective, 2-Year Follow-Up, Observational, Post-Marketing Study
Published in
Advances in Therapy, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12325-015-0245-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Francois Gautier, Luc Martinez, Alfred Penfornis, Eveline Eschwège, Guillaume Charpentier, Benoît Huret, Suliya Madani, Pierre Gourdy

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the efficacy of liraglutide observed in randomized controlled trials translates into therapeutic benefits in the French population during routine clinical practice. This observational, prospective, multicenter study included 3152 adults with type 2 diabetes who had recently started or were about to start liraglutide treatment. During 2 years of follow-up, an evaluation of the reasons for prescribing liraglutide, maintenance dose of liraglutide, changes in combined antidiabetic treatments, level of glycemic control, change in body weight and body mass index (BMI), patient satisfaction with diabetes treatment and safety of liraglutide were investigated. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of patients still receiving liraglutide and presenting with HbA1c <7.0% after 2 years of follow-up. At the end of the study, 29.5% of patients maintained liraglutide treatment and reached the HbA1c target. Mean (±SD) HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose concentration, body weight and BMI were significantly reduced from baseline [8.46% (±1.46) to 7.44% (±1.20); 180 (±60) to 146 (±44) mg/dL; 95.2 (±20.0) to 91.1 (±19.6) kg; 34.0 (±7.2) to 32.5 (±6.9) kg/m(2); respectively, all P < 0.0001]. Patient treatment satisfaction increased, with the mean diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire status version score increasing from 22.17 (±7.64) to 28.55 (±5.79), P < 0.0001. The main adverse event type was gastrointestinal, with a frequency of 10.9%, and the percentage of patients suffering ≥1 hypoglycemic episode decreased from 6.9% to 4.4%. The results of the EVIDENCE study suggest that the effectiveness of liraglutide in real-world clinical practice is similar to that observed in randomized controlled trials. Novo Nordisk A/S. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01226966.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 22 18%
Other 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,428,159
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,630
of 2,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,225
of 274,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#16
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.