↓ Skip to main content

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the complex path to precision medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the complex path to precision medicine
Published in
Journal of Neurology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00415-018-8983-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Talbot, Emily Feneberg, Jakub Scaber, Alexander G. Thompson, Martin R. Turner

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease of the corticomotorneuronal network responsible for voluntary movement. There are well-established clinical, genetic and pathological overlaps between ALS and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), which together constitute the 'TDP-43 proteinopathies'. An ever-expanding list of genes in which mutation leads to typical ALS have implicated abnormalities in RNA processing, protein homoeostasis and axonal transport. How these apparently distinct pathways converge to cause the characteristic clinical syndrome of ALS remains unclear. Although there are major gaps in our understanding of the essential nature of ALS pathophysiology, the identification of genetic causes in up to 15% of ALS patients, coupled with advances in biotechnology and biomarker research provide a foundation for approaches to treatment based on 'precision medicine', and even prevention of the disease in pre-symptomatic mutation carriers in the future. Currently, multidisciplinary care remains the bedrock of management and this is increasingly being put onto an evidence-based footing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 32 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 37 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,924,836
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#627
of 4,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,976
of 330,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#13
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.