↓ Skip to main content

Biotic and Abiotic Factors Interact to Regulate Northern Peatland Carbon Cycling

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Biotic and Abiotic Factors Interact to Regulate Northern Peatland Carbon Cycling
Published in
Ecosystems, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9907-4
Authors

Alona Armstrong, Susan Waldron, Nicholas J. Ostle, Harriett Richardson, Jeanette Whitaker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Germany 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Unspecified 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,610,911
of 23,650,645 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#110
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,651
of 275,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,650,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.