You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic influences on brain asymmetry: A DTI study of 374 twins and siblings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroImage, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.236 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neda Jahanshad, Agatha D. Lee, Marina Barysheva, Katie L. McMahon, Greig I. de Zubicaray, Nicholas G. Martin, Margaret J. Wright, Arthur W. Toga, Paul M. Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 28% |
| Researcher | 30 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 26 | 18% |
| Psychology | 23 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#6,257
of 12,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,255
of 104,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#36
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.