Title |
Variation in health services utilization among ethnic populations.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2006
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.050674 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hude Quan, Andrew Fong, Carolyn De Coster, Jianli Wang, Richard Musto, Tom W Noseworthy, William A Ghali |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 137 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
Researcher | 16 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Other | 23 | 16% |
Unknown | 33 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,147,459
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3,263
of 9,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,473
of 86,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#17
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.