| Title |
Spatial effects of artificial feeders on hummingbird abundance, floral visitation and pollen deposition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-015-1287-1 |
| Authors |
Jesper Sonne, Peter Kyvsgaard, Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama, Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni, Jeff Ollerton, Marlies Sazima, Carsten Rahbek, Bo Dalsgaard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 6 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,519,445
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#101
of 1,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,322
of 275,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.