↓ Skip to main content

The effect of pregabalin and celecoxib on the analgesic requirements after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of pregabalin and celecoxib on the analgesic requirements after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00540-015-2078-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Usha Gurunathan, Ivan L. Rapchuk, Gillian King, Adrian G. Barnett, John F. Fraser

Abstract

Early postoperative pain is a common complaint after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The use of non-opioid medications as a part of multimodal analgesia has been increasingly advocated in the management of acute post-surgical pain. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin, celecoxib, and their combination in the management of acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One hundred ASA I/II patients scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned to receive two perioperative doses, 12 h apart, of either pregabalin alone, celecoxib alone, their combination, or a placebo. Standard anesthetic protocol was followed. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest and with movement. Secondary outcomes were fentanyl requirements and side effects, which were assessed at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h following surgery. Patient satisfaction with pain relief was recorded at discharge. Differences in main outcomes were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between the four groups in terms of outcomes such as rest pain, movement pain, postoperative fentanyl requirements, or changes in anxiety scores. Patients who had only celecoxib had significantly higher satisfaction with pain management (p = 0.013). Patients who had only pregabalin were at three-times-higher odds of having drowsiness (p = 0.040) and four-times-higher odds of having lightheadedness (p = 0.019) when compared with the placebo group. Pregabalin, celecoxib alone, or in combination offers no analgesic superiority over standard opioid care in the treatment of postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 26 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,024,720
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#55
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,459
of 274,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.