| Title |
Using Crowd-Sourced Data to Study Public Services: Lessons from Urban India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Studies in Comparative International Development, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12116-018-9271-4 |
| Authors |
Alison E. Post, Anustubh Agnihotri, Christopher Hyun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 20 | 32% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,788,689
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#119
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,024
of 330,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.