| Title |
Seasonal changes in the biomass of floating leaved plant, Trapa spp., and its relation with a leaf beetle, Galerucella nipponensis, in Lake Inba, Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Limnology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10201-018-0554-2 |
| Authors |
On Saito, Tatsuya Kobayashi, Maiko Hiroi, Masayuki Kawatsu, Shun Takagi, Jun Nishihiro, Maiko Kagami |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 94% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,786,861
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Limnology
#7
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,846
of 342,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Limnology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them