↓ Skip to main content

Does the frequency of respiratory tract infections help to identify humoral immunodeficiencies in a primary health-care cohort?

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the frequency of respiratory tract infections help to identify humoral immunodeficiencies in a primary health-care cohort?
Published in
Infectious Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.3109/00365548.2014.956330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per Wågström, Malin Bengnér, Charlotte Dahle, Åsa Nilsdotter-Augustinsson, Thomas Neumark, Lars Brudin, Janne Björkander

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Materials Science 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,428,159
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Diseases
#374
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,412
of 262,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Diseases
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.