↓ Skip to main content

Development and application of metal organic framework/chitosan foams based on ultrasound-assisted solid-phase extraction coupling to UPLC-MS/MS for the determination of five parabens in water

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Development and application of metal organic framework/chitosan foams based on ultrasound-assisted solid-phase extraction coupling to UPLC-MS/MS for the determination of five parabens in water
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-1269-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuo Li, Mengtian Jia, Hongqiao Guo, Xiaohong Hou

Abstract

In this work, a variety of highly porous metal organic framework/chitosan (MOF/CS) foams (MIL-53(Al)/CS, MIL-53(Fe)/CS, MIL-101(Cr)/CS, MIL-101(Fe)/CS, UiO-66(Zr)/CS, and MIL-100(Fe)/CS) were designed and prepared by an ice-templating process. The introduction of MOFs made these foams achieve excellent inherent characters in terms of strength, stability, and adsorption ability. The MOFs incorporated in the foams retained their unique properties. Additionally, the foams were durable and their adsorption abilities had only a little loss after being recycled several times. MIL-53(Al)/CS foam was selected as an adsorbent candidate to develop an ultrasound-assisted solid-phase extraction (UA-SPE) method for the first time, owing to its particularly noteworthy performance among the prepared MOF/CS foams. The method was then successfully applied to extract trace amount of five parabens (methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben, benzylparaben) in water samples, followed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) detection. Several experimental parameters were investigated. Under the optimal conditions, the linear ranges were 0.5-200 μg/L with regression coefficients (r2) from 0.9948 to 0.9983. The method detection limits were between 0.09 and 0.45 μg/L. The recoveries ranged from 78.75 to 102.1% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) < 7.4%. Furthermore, the molecular interactions and free binding energies between MOFs and parabens were calculated by means of molecular docking to explain the adsorption mechanism deeply. The novel method proposed in this work exhibited many benefits such as easy operation, high enrichment efficiency, less solvent consuming, and higher sensitivity. Such a strategy would expand the application prospect of MOFs in sample pretreatment. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 20 40%
Chemical Engineering 3 6%
Materials Science 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,335,799
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,452
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,460
of 340,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#15
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.