| Title |
Degradation of fipronil by Stenotrophomonasacidaminiphila isolated from rhizospheric soil of Zea mays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
3 Biotech, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13205-015-0354-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shivani Uniyal, Rashmi Paliwal, R. K. Sharma, J. P. N. Rai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,574,392
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from 3 Biotech
#185
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,783
of 400,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 3 Biotech
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.