↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 virus-like particles production in insect cells

Overview of attention for article published in ImmunoMethods, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterizing Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 virus-like particles production in insect cells
Published in
ImmunoMethods, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.09.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Balaji Somasundaram, Cindy Chang, Yuan Y. Fan, Pei-Yin Lim, Jane Cardosa, Linda Lua

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Chemical Engineering 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,393,063
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from ImmunoMethods
#520
of 2,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,104
of 288,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ImmunoMethods
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.