↓ Skip to main content

Opioid Tolerance Development: A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,465)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
Title
Opioid Tolerance Development: A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Perspective
Published in
The AAPS Journal, November 2008
DOI 10.1208/s12248-008-9056-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily O. Dumas, Gary M. Pollack

Abstract

The opioids are commonly used to treat acute and severe pain. Long-term opioid administration eventually reaches a dose ceiling that is attributable to the rapid onset of analgesic tolerance coupled with the slow development of tolerance to the untoward side effects of respiratory depression, nausea and decreased gastrointestinal motility. The need for effective-long term analgesia remains. In order to develop new therapeutics and novel strategies for use of current analgesics, the processes that mediate tolerance must be understood. This review highlights potential pharmacokinetic (changes in metabolite production, metabolizing enzyme expression, and transporter function) and pharmacodynamic (receptor type, location and functionality; alterations in signaling pathways and cross-tolerance) aspects of opioid tolerance development, and presents several pharmacodynamic modeling strategies that have been used to characterize time-dependent attenuation of opioid analgesia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 360 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 19%
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 13%
Researcher 35 10%
Other 29 8%
Other 62 17%
Unknown 71 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 38 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 10%
Neuroscience 27 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 7%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 80 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#244,707
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#5
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#491
of 104,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them