↓ Skip to main content

Heterologous AdpA transcription factors enhance landomycin production in Streptomyces cyanogenus S136 under a broad range of growth conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Heterologous AdpA transcription factors enhance landomycin production in Streptomyces cyanogenus S136 under a broad range of growth conditions
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9249-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oleksandr Yushchuk, Iryna Ostash, Iryna Vlasiuk, Tetiana Gren, Andriy Luzhetskyy, Joern Kalinowski, Victor Fedorenko, Bohdan Ostash

Abstract

Streptomyces cyanogenus S136 is the only known producer of landomycin A (LaA), one of the largest glycosylated angucycline antibiotics possessing strong antiproliferative properties. There is rising interest in elucidation of mechanisms of action of landomycins, which, in turn, requires access to large quantities of the pure compounds. Overproduction of LaA has been achieved in the past through manipulation of cluster-situated regulatory genes. However, other components of the LaA biosynthetic regulatory network remain unknown. To fill this gap, we elucidated the contribution of AdpA family pleiotropic regulators in landomycin production via expression of adpA genes of different origins in S. cyanogenus S136. Overexpression of the native S. cyanogenus S136 adpA ortholog had no effect on landomycin titers. In the same time, expression of several heterologous adpA genes led to significantly increased landomycin production under different cultivation conditions. Hence, heterologous adpA genes are a useful tool to enhance or activate landomycin production by S. cyanogenus. Our ongoing research effort is focused on identification of mutations that render S. cyanogenus AdpA nonfunctional.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#21,608,038
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,994
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,788
of 333,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#98
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.