↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of qPCR and ddPCR used for quantification of the JAK2 V617F allele burden in Ph negative MPNs

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of qPCR and ddPCR used for quantification of the JAK2 V617F allele burden in Ph negative MPNs
Published in
Annals of Hematology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00277-018-3451-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorota Link-Lenczowska, Niels Pallisgaard, Sabrina Cordua, Magdalena Zawada, Sylwia Czekalska, Dorota Krochmalczyk, Zuzanna Kanduła, Tomasz Sacha

Abstract

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a diverse group of diseases whose common feature is the presence of V617F mutation of the JAK2 gene. In the era of novel therapeutic strategies in MPNs, such as JAK-inhibitor therapy, there is a growing need for establishing high sensitive quantitative methods, which can be useful not only at diagnosis but also for monitoring therapeutic outcomes, such as minimal residual disease (MRD). In this study, we compared the qPCR and ddPCR methods and their clinical utility for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment monitoring of MPNs with JAK2 V617F mutation in 63 MPN patients of which 6 were subjected to ruxolitinib treatment. We show a high conformance between the two methods (correlation coefficient r = 0.998 (p < 0.0001)). Our experiments revealed high analytical sensitivity for both tests, suggesting that they are capable of detecting the JAK2 V617F mutation at diagnosis of MPN with a limit of detection (LoD) of 0.12% for qPCR and 0.01% for ddPCR. The alterations of JAK2 V617F allele burden in patients treated with ruxolitinib were measured by both methods with equal accuracy. The results suggest an advantage of ddPCR in monitoring MRD because of allele burdens below the LoD of qPCR. Overall, the clinical utility of qPCR and ddPCR is very high, and both methods could be recommended for the routine detection of the V617F mutation at diagnosis, though ddPCR will probably supersede qPCR in the future due to cost-effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Other 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 30 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 36 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,542,250
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#1,175
of 2,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,493
of 330,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#24
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.