↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Usual Blood Pressure and Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Evidence From 4.1 Million Adults and a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Usual Blood Pressure and Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Evidence From 4.1 Million Adults and a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
Published in
JACC, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Connor A. Emdin, Simon G. Anderson, Mark Woodward, Kazem Rahimi

Abstract

Reliable quantification of the association between blood pressure (BP) and risk of type 2 diabetes is lacking. This study sought to determine the association between usual BP and risk of diabetes, overall and by participant characteristics. A cohort of 4.1 million adults, free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, was identified using validated linked electronic health records. Analyses were complemented by a meta-analysis of prospective studies that reported relative risks of new-onset diabetes per unit of systolic blood pressure (SBP). Among the overall cohort, 20 mm Hg higher SBP and 10 mm Hg higher diastolic BP were associated with a 58% and a 52% higher risk of new-onset diabetes (hazard ratio: 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56 to 1.59; and hazard ratio: 1.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.51 to 1.54), respectively. There was no evidence of a nadir to a baseline BP of 110/70 mm Hg. The strength of the association per 20 mm Hg higher SBP declined with age and with increasing body mass index. Estimates were similar even after excluding individuals prescribed antihypertensive or lipid-lowering therapies. Systematic review identified 30 studies with 285,664 participants and 17,388 incident diabetes events. The pooled relative risk of diabetes for a 20 mm Hg higher usual SBP across these studies was 1.77 (1.53 to 2.05). People with elevated BP are at increased risk of diabetes. The strength of the association declined with increasing body mass index and age. Further research should determine if the observed risk is modifiable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 16%
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 63 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 78 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 260. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#142,498
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#318
of 17,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,747
of 290,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#6
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.