You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classifying individuals at high-risk for psychosis based on functional brain activity during working memory processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroImage: Clinical, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerstin Bendfeldt, Renata Smieskova, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Stefan Klöppel, André Schmidt, Anna Walter, Fabienne Harrisberger, Johannes Wrege, Andor Simon, Bernd Taschler, Thomas Nichols, Anita Riecher-Rössler, Undine E. Lang, Ernst-Wilhelm Radue, Stefan Borgwardt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2015.
All research outputs
#21,275,730
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage: Clinical
#2,397
of 2,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,707
of 290,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage: Clinical
#50
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.