↓ Skip to main content

Opioids, gliosis and central immunomodulation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Opioids, gliosis and central immunomodulation
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00540-018-2534-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salim Kadhim, John McDonald, David G. Lambert

Abstract

Neuropathic pain is a common health problem that affects millions of people worldwide. Despite being studied extensively, the cellular and molecular events underlying the central immunomodulation and the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain is still controversial. The idea that 'glial cells are merely housekeepers' is incorrect and with respect to initiation and maintenance of neuropathic pain, microglia and astrocytes have important roles to play. Glial cells differentially express opioid receptors and are thought to be functionally modulated by the activation of these receptors. In this review, we discuss evidence for glia-opioid modulation of pain by focusing on the pattern of astrocyte and microglial activation throughout the progress of nerve injury/neuropathic pain. Activation of astrocytes and microglia is a key step in central immunomodulation in terms of releasing pro-inflammatory markers and propagation of a 'central immune response'. Inhibition of astrocytes before and after induction of neuropathic pain has been found to prevent and reverse neuropathic pain, respectively. Moreover, microglial inhibitors have been found to prevent (but not to reverse) neuropathic pain. As they are expressed by glia, opioid receptors are expected to have a role to play in neuropathic pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,645,475
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#586
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,257
of 330,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.