You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Establishing diversity in the dopaminergic system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Febs Letters, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.09.016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriela O. Bodea, Sandra Blaess |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 25% |
| Researcher | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 39 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#12,644
of 14,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,964
of 290,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#42
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.