↓ Skip to main content

Role of Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation (Anammox) in Nitrogen Removal from a Freshwater Aquifer

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation (Anammox) in Nitrogen Removal from a Freshwater Aquifer
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, October 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b02488
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard L. Smith, J. K. Böhlke, Bongkeun Song, Craig R. Tobias

Abstract

Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) couples the oxidation of ammonium with the reduction of nitrite, producing N<sub>2</sub>. The presence and activity of anammox bacteria in groundwater were investigated at multiple locations in an aquifer variably affected by a large, wastewater-derived contaminant plume. Anammox bacteria were detected at all locations tested using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and quantification of hydrazine oxidoreductase (<i>hzo</i>) gene transcripts. Anammox and denitrification activities were quantified by <i>in situ</i> <sup>15</sup>NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> tracer tests along anoxic flow paths in areas of varying ammonium, nitrate, and organic carbon abundances. Rates of denitrification and anammox were determined by quantifying changes in <sup>28</sup></sup>N<sub>2</sub>, <sup>29</sup>N<sub>2</sub>, <sup>30</sup>N<sub>2</sub>, <sup>15</sup>NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, <sup>15</sup>NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>, and <sup>15</sup>NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> with groundwater travel time. Anammox was present and active in all areas tested, including where ammonium and dissolved organic carbon concentrations were low, but decreased in proportion to denitrification when acetate was added to increase available electron supply. Anammox contributed 39-90% of potential N<sub>2</sub> production in this aquifer, with rates on the order of 10 nmol N<sup>2</sup>-N L<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>. Although rates of both anammox and denitrification during the tracer tests were low, they were sufficient to reduce inorganic nitrogen concentrations substantially during the overall groundwater residence times in the aquifer. These results demonstrate that anammox activity in groundwater can rival that of denitrification and may need to be considered when assessing nitrogen mass transport and permanent loss of fixed nitrogen in aquifers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 26 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,835,918
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#2,313
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,209
of 286,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#40
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.