↓ Skip to main content

Protection and pathology in TB: learning from the zebrafish model

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Immunopathology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Protection and pathology in TB: learning from the zebrafish model
Published in
Seminars in Immunopathology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00281-015-0522-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annemarie H. Meijer

Abstract

Zebrafish has earned its place among animal models of tuberculosis. Its natural pathogen, Mycobacterium marinum, shares major virulence factors with the human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In adult zebrafish, which possess recombination-activated adaptive immunity, it can cause acute infection or a chronic progressive disease with containment of mycobacteria in well-structured, caseating granulomas. In addition, a low-dose model that closely mimics human latent infection has recently been developed. These models are used alongside infection of optically transparent zebrafish embryos and larvae that rely on innate immunity and permit non-invasive visualization of the early stages of developing granulomas that are inaccessible in other animal models. By microinjecting mycobacteria intravenously or into different tissues, systemic and localized infections can be induced, each useful for studying particular aspects of early pathogenesis, such as phagocyte recruitment, granuloma expansion and maintenance, vascularization of granulomas, and the phagocyte-mediated dissemination of mycobacteria. This has contributed to new insights into the mycobacteria-driven mechanisms that promote granuloma formation, the double-edged role of inflammation, the mechanisms of macrophage cell death that favor disease progression, and the host-protective role of autophagy. As a result, zebrafish models are now increasingly used to explore strategies for adjunctive therapy of tuberculosis with host-directed drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 140 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 33 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 40 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,640,663
of 23,464,797 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Immunopathology
#186
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,006
of 268,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Immunopathology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,464,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.