| Title |
Choices for Induction of Pluripotency: Recent Developments in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Reprogramming Strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12015-015-9622-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marinka Brouwer, Huiqing Zhou, Nael Nadif Kasri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 74 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,659,252
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#104
of 1,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,185
of 287,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.