↓ Skip to main content

Epstein Barr Virus Volume 1

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: EBV and Autoimmunity.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
EBV and Autoimmunity.
Chapter number 15
Book title
Epstein Barr Virus Volume 1
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22822-8_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922821-1, 978-3-31-922822-8
Authors

Ascherio, Alberto, Munger, Kassandra L, Alberto Ascherio, Kassandra L. Munger, Munger, Kassandra L.

Abstract

Although a role of EBV in autoimmunity is biologically plausible and evidence of altered immune responses to EBV is abundant in several autoimmune diseases, inference on causality requires the determination that disease risk is higher in individuals infected with EBV than in those uninfected and that in the latter it increases following EBV infection. This determination has so far been possible only for multiple sclerosis (MS) and, to some extent, for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), whereas evidence is either lacking or not supportive for other autoimmune conditions. In this chapter, we present the main epidemiological findings that justify the conclusion that EBV is a component cause of MS and SLE and possible mechanisms underlying these effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 37 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 43 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,673,538
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#163
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,487
of 356,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.