| Title |
Differences in reported sepsis incidence according to study design: a literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-016-0237-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saga Elise Mariansdatter, Andreas Halgreen Eiset, Kirstine Kobberøe Søgaard, Christian Fynbo Christiansen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |