| Title |
Radiocarbon in food: a non-problem of health effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Chemistry Letters, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10311-009-0264-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. van der Plicht, J. P. M. Beijers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 31% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,880,423
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Chemistry Letters
#52
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,111
of 164,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Chemistry Letters
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them