↓ Skip to main content

Neural processing of the own child’s facial emotions in mothers with a history of early life maltreatment

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Neural processing of the own child’s facial emotions in mothers with a history of early life maltreatment
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00406-018-0929-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corinne Neukel, Sabine C. Herpertz, Catherine Hinid-Attar, Anna-Lena Zietlow, Anna Fuchs, Eva Moehler, Felix Bermpohl, Katja Bertsch

Abstract

Early life maltreatment (ELM) has long-lasting effects on social interaction. When interacting with their own child, women with ELM often report difficulties in parenting and show reduced maternal sensitivity. Sensitive maternal behavior requires the recognition of the child's emotional state depicted in its facial emotions. Based on previous studies, it can be expected that ELM affects the neural processing of facial emotions by altering activation patterns in parts of the brain's empathy and mentalizing networks. However, so far studies have focused on the processing of standardized, adult facial emotions. Therefore, the current study investigated the impact of ELM on the processing of one's own child's facial emotions using functional magnetic resonance imaging. To achieve this, 27 mothers with and 26 mothers without a history of ELM (all without current mental disorders and psychopharmacological treatment) took part in an emotional face recognition paradigm with happy, sad, and neutral faces of their own and an unknown primary school-aged child of the same age and sex. We found elevated activations in regions of the mentalizing (superior temporal sulcus, precuneus) and mirror neuron (inferior parietal lobule) networks as well as in the visual face processing network (cuneus, middle temporal gyrus) in mothers with ELM compared to the non-maltreated mothers in response to happy faces of their own child. This suggests a more effortful processing and cognitive empathic mentalizing of the own child's facial happiness in mothers with ELM. Future research should address whether this might indicate a compensatory recruitment of mentalizing capacities to maintain maternal sensitivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 61 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 31%
Neuroscience 15 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Computer Science 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 61 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#16,539,065
of 24,333,504 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#1,137
of 1,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,624
of 333,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,333,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.