↓ Skip to main content

Development of a pan-Babesia FRET-qPCR and a survey of livestock from five Caribbean islands

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Development of a pan-Babesia FRET-qPCR and a survey of livestock from five Caribbean islands
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0560-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Li, Patrick Kelly, Jilei Zhang, Chuanling Xu, Chengming Wang

Abstract

Babesia spp. are tick-borne protozoan hemoparasites and the second most common blood-borne parasites of mammals, in particular domestic animals. We used the Clustal Multiple Alignment program and 18S rRNA gene sequences of 22 Babesia species from GenBank to develop a PCR that could detect a wide variety of Babesia spp. in a single reaction. The pan-Babesia FRET-qPCR we developed reliably detected B. gibsoni, B. canis, B. vogeli, B. microti, B. bovis, and B. divergens under controlled conditions but did not react with closely related species, mainly Hepatozoon americanum, Theileria equi, and Toxoplasma gondii. When we tested the pan-Babesia FRET-qPCR on DNA of whole blood from 752 cattle, sheep, goats, donkeys and horses from five Caribbean islands, we detected Babesia spp. expected to be present in the animals, mainly B. bovis and B. bigemina in cattle and B. caballi in horses and donkeys. Further, we found that animals were not uncommonly infected with species of Babesia usually associated with other hosts, mainly B. vogeli and B. gibsoni in cattle, sheep and goats, B. rossi in goats, and B. caballi in goats and sheep. Finally, the pan-Babesia FRET-qPCR enabled us to identify unknown species of Babesia in cattle, goats, sheep and donkeys. Overall, 70 % (525/752) of the animals we tested were positive confirming earlier limited studies that infections with Babesia spp. are common in livestock in the Caribbean.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 31%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,291,564
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#453
of 3,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,228
of 274,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#11
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.