↓ Skip to main content

Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: long-term outcome of neonatal survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: long-term outcome of neonatal survivors
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, May 1997
DOI 10.1007/s004670050281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sushmita Roy, Michael J. Dillon, Richard S. Trompeter, T. Martin Barratt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 13 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,857
of 4,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,549
of 29,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them