↓ Skip to main content

Robot-assisted vs. conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Die Orthopädie, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Robot-assisted vs. conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Published in
Die Orthopädie, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00132-018-3604-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Fu, Yuning Wang, Xiang Li, Baozhan Yu, Ming Ni, Wei Chai, Libo Hao, Jiying Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 20 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Engineering 5 9%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,266,724
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#53
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,235
of 341,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.