↓ Skip to main content

Glycated albumin (GA) and inflammation: role of GA as a potential marker of inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammation Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Glycated albumin (GA) and inflammation: role of GA as a potential marker of inflammation
Published in
Inflammation Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00011-017-1089-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Vernon Roohk, Asad R. Zaidi, Dimple Patel

Abstract

Abnormal levels of glycated albumin (GA) are associated with the onset of both diabetes and inflammation. Although inflammation has long been associated with diabetes, this article aims to explore the underlying mechanisms of this relationship as it pertains to the role of GA. We have reviewed 52 research articles since the year 2000. Common search terms used were "(inflammatory mediator) and GA" or "inflammation and GA". The findings have been organized according to diabetic complications with respect to the interactions of GA and inflammatory mediators. Glycated albumin and specific inflammatory mediators have been reported to play various roles in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, retinopathy, and nephropathy. In the case of nephropathy and recently retinopathy, there is considerable evidence for GA in concert with inflammation playing a direct role in organ pathology. There is copious literature detailing GA's involvement in stimulating inflammatory markers and certain pro-inflammatory cytokines. A recent clinical study has shown GA to be a marker for inflammation in non-diabetic rheumatoid arthritis patients with the significance of standard inflammatory markers. The clinical utility of GA measurement may likely reside in its versatility as both a mediator of inflammation as well as a marker to track hyperglycemia and other diabetes complications. Further understanding of the role GA plays in glycemic and inflammatory diseases could lead to its acceptance as an independent bio-inflammatory marker.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,173
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation Research
#791
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,387
of 324,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation Research
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.