↓ Skip to main content

Adult height and head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis within the INHANCE Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Adult height and head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis within the INHANCE Consortium
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10654-013-9863-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emanuele Leoncini, Walter Ricciardi, Gabriella Cadoni, Dario Arzani, Livia Petrelli, Gaetano Paludetti, Paul Brennan, Daniele Luce, Isabelle Stucker, Keitaro Matsuo, Renato Talamini, Carlo La Vecchia, Andrew F. Olshan, Deborah M. Winn, Rolando Herrero, Silvia Franceschi, Xavier Castellsague, Joshua Muscat, Hal Morgenstern, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Fabio Levi, Luigino Dal Maso, Karl Kelsey, Michael McClean, Thomas L. Vaughan, Philip Lazarus, Mark P. Purdue, Richard B. Hayes, Chu Chen, Stephen M. Schwartz, Oxana Shangina, Sergio Koifman, Wolfgang Ahrens, Elena Matos, Pagona Lagiou, Jolanta Lissowska, Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Leticia Fernandez, Ana Menezes, Antonio Agudo, Alexander W. Daudt, Lorenzo Richiardi, Kristina Kjaerheim, Dana Mates, Jaroslav Betka, Guo-Pei Yu, Stimson Schantz, Lorenzo Simonato, Hermann Brenner, David I. Conway, Tatiana V. Macfarlane, Peter Thomson, Eleonora Fabianova, Ariana Znaor, Peter Rudnai, Claire Healy, Paolo Boffetta, Shu-Chun Chuang, Yuan-Chin Amy Lee, Mia Hashibe, Stefania Boccia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 26 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,927,055
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#706
of 1,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,881
of 301,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.