↓ Skip to main content

Recombinant and epitope-based vaccines on the road to the market and implications for vaccine design and production

Overview of attention for article published in Human vaccines immunotherapeutics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recombinant and epitope-based vaccines on the road to the market and implications for vaccine design and production
Published in
Human vaccines immunotherapeutics, October 2015
DOI 10.1080/21645515.2015.1094595
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricio Oyarzún, Bostjan Kobe

Abstract

Novel vaccination approaches based on rational design of B- and T-cell epitopes - epitope-based vaccines - are making progress in the clinical trial pipeline. The epitope-focused recombinant protein-based malaria vaccine (termed RTS,S) is a next-generation approach that successfully reached phase-III trials, and will potentially become the first commercial vaccine against a human parasitic disease. Progress made on methods such as recombinant DNA technology, advanced cell-culture techniques, immunoinformatics and rational design of immunogens are driving the development of these novel concepts. Synthetic recombinant proteins comprising both B- and T-cell epitopes can be efficiently produced through modern biotechnology and bioprocessing methods, and can enable the induction of large repertoires of immune specificities. In particular, the inclusion of appropriate CD4+ T-cell epitopes is increasingly considered a key vaccine component to elicit robust immune responses, as suggested by results coming from HIV-1 clinical trials. In silico strategies for vaccine design are under active development to address genetic variation in pathogens and several broadly protective "universal" influenza and HIV-1 vaccines are currently at different stages of clinical trials. Other methods focus on improving population coverage in target populations by rationally considering specificity and prevalence of the HLA proteins, though a proof-of-concept in humans has not been demonstrated yet. Overall, we expect immunoinformatics and bioprocessing methods to become a central part of the next-generation epitope-based vaccine development and production process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 128 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Chemistry 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 41 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human vaccines immunotherapeutics
#3,230
of 3,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,426
of 287,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human vaccines immunotherapeutics
#63
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.