↓ Skip to main content

Exploring medicines management by COPD patients and their social networks after hospital discharge

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Exploring medicines management by COPD patients and their social networks after hospital discharge
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11096-018-0688-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Ingrid Schafheutle, Tom Fegan, Darren M. Ashcroft

Abstract

Background Unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are a major burden on health services. Effective medicines management is crucial to avoid such admissions but little is known about the role of social networks in supporting medicines-taking. Objective To examine the activities and strategies recently discharged COPD patients and their social network members (SNMs) utilise to manage their medicines. Setting COPD patients recently discharged from an acute NHS Trust in Northwest England. Methods Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews; audio-recorded and transcribed with consent, NVivo v11 facilitated qualitative thematic analysis. NHS ethical approved. Main outcome measure Interview topic guide and analysis informed by Cheraghi-Sohi et al.'s conceptual framework for 'medication work' exploring medication-articulation, informational, emotional and surveillance work. Results Twelve interviews were conducted during March-August 2016. Participants' social networks were small (n < 5) and restricted to family members and healthcare professionals. Participants social network members performed similar medication-articulation and surveillance work to coronary heart disease, arthritis and diabetes patients. When participants social network members resolved issues identified by surveillance work, this medication work was conceptualised as surveillance-articulation work. The social network members performed little emotional work and were infrequently involved in informational work despite some participants describing informational needs. After discharge, participants reverted to pre-admission routines/habits/strategies for obtaining medication supplies, organising medicines, keeping track of supplies, ensuring adherence within daily regimens, and monitoring symptoms, which could cause issues. Conclusion This study applied Cheraghi-Sohi's framework for medication work to COPD patients and described the role of the social network members. Pharmacists could proactively explore medication infrastructures and work with patients and their close social network members to support medication work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 27 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 30 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,242,890
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#220
of 1,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,585
of 330,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.