↓ Skip to main content

Which Ticker Format Works Best? Effects of Updating and Scrolling News Content on Viewer Memory and Program Engagement

Overview of attention for article published in Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which Ticker Format Works Best? Effects of Updating and Scrolling News Content on Viewer Memory and Program Engagement
Published in
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, September 2015
DOI 10.1177/1077699015604851
Authors

Jean M. Brechman, Steven Bellman, Jennifer A. Robinson, Shiree Treleaven-Hassard, Duane Varan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,374,110
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
#611
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,944
of 275,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.