↓ Skip to main content

Double collisions for a classical particle system with nongravitational interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, December 1981
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 155)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Double collisions for a classical particle system with nongravitational interactions
Published in
Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, December 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf02566226
Authors

Richard McGehee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 50%
Physics and Astronomy 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,467,888
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici
#11
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,337
of 30,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.